|
Latest Clinical Results
1. SPINECOR PATIENTS INITIAL COHORT
At Ste-Justine Hospital
patients have been treated with the SpineCor system since 1993. For this
group of consecutively treated Idiopathic Scoliosis patients the average age at
the commencement of treatment was 13 years (SD : 1 year), with 176 female and 19
male subjects. The initial major Cobb angle for the patients with a major
curve of less than 30° was 23° (SD: 5°, n = 115), and for patients with a major
curve of greater than 30° the Cobb angle was 36° (SD: 4°, n = 80). For the
two groups of patients the initial Risser sign was 0 for 86 and 45
patients, Risser 1 for 7 and 11 patients, Risser 2 for 12 and 7 patients, Risser
3 for 10 and 13 patients, and 2 patients with a Risser 4. The initial
cohort characteristics by curve amplitude and curve type as well as the minimum
Cobb angle during treatment are presented in Table 1.
Table 1 : Initial
Characteristics of Idiopathic Scoliosis Patient Population
|
Initial Cobb Angle
(Deg) |
Cobb Angle Minimum During
Treatment |
Percent
Reduction |
| n |
Mean |
Stdev |
Mean |
STdev |
Mean |
STdev |
All
Patients
Thoracic
Thoracolumbar
Lumbar
Double |
195
72
58
22
43 |
29
30
25
24
32 |
8
8
8
6
7 |
18
20
13
16
23 |
10
10
8
7
11 |
38
35
50
36
31 |
26
24
26
25
26 |
Less than
30°
Thoracic
Thoracolumbar
Lumbar
Double |
115
37
44
18
16 |
23
24
22
22
24 |
5
4
4
4
5 |
13
15
10
15
15 |
8
7
7
7
9 |
45
41
54
36
42 |
28
26
27
27
32 |
Greater than
30°
Thoracic
Thoracolumbar
Lumbar
Double |
80
35
14
4
27 |
36
36
36
33
37 |
4
4
4
2
4 |
26
26
23
21
28 |
8
8
6
6
8 |
28
28
35
37
23 |
20
21
19
18
18 |
At the last available visit there were 109 patients still under treatment
with a mean treatment time of 1.5 years (SD: 1 year), and 71 have terminated
treatment with a post treatment follow-up time ranging from 0 to 4.5
years. From this cohort of 195 patients, there were 8 patients who
progressed to surgery. The patients who progressed to surgery had an
initial mean Cobb angle of 34° (SD:5°), with a mean end of treatment Cobb angle
of 45° (SD:6°) after 2 years (SD:1 year) of treatment. There were also 15
patients who withdrew from treatment after a mean of 1.2 years (SD: .72
years).
2. Outcome for Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with a Minimum 2-year Follow-up
After Treatment with the SpineCor System
For the patients who have completed treatment there are 29 who had a minimum
follow-up time of 2 years (mean 29 months SD : 4 months). The initial Cobb angle
for this sub-cohort of patients was 29º (SD:7º), and after 3 months of treatment
the mean Cobb angle was 19º (SD:11º) corresponding to an overall mean decrease
of 10º (SD: 5º) representing a reducibility of 40% (SD:
28%). At the end of treatment (time=24 months; SD 9 months; Risser 3 or 4)
the mean Cobb angle was 21º (SD:12º). At this time there were 61% of the
patients who maintained the initial correction obtained at three months, with
35% aggravating and 4% improving. The mean Cobb angle at 2 years follow-up
was 24º (SD:11º), where 66% maintained their end of treatment Cobb angle, 6%
improved and 28% worsened.
At 2 years follow-up there was an overall
correction in reference to the patients initial state of greater than 5° for
55% of the patients (mean: 10°; range: 6° (16%) to 15° (83%)), there was a
stabilisation for 38% (mean: 2° (9%); range -3° (19%) to 5° (25%)) and 7% of the
patients worsened, (mean: -8° (31%); Range: -6° (-17%) to -10° (-33%). The
evolution during treatment for the improved, stabilised and aggravated
patients are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1:

General Treatment Trend
For the 29 patients that had a minimum 2-year
follow-up a repeated measures analysis of variance was performed, comparing the
initial state, 3months in brace, end of treatment, 1 year and 2 years
follow-up. Since this is a preliminary analysis of an initial cohort of 29
patients, a significance level of p<0.01 was chosen. There was a
significant difference between the initial condition and 3months (10°±5°), end
of treatment (7°±7°) as well as follow-up 1 and 2 years (4°±7° and 5°±7°,
respectively). There was no difference between 3 months and end of
treatment (-3°±8°), and follow-up 1 year (-6°±7°), but a difference
between 3 months and the 2 year follow-up (-5°±7°). At the end
of treatment there was no difference with follow-up 1 year (-3°±6°), and 2 years
(-2°±5°), as well as between 1 and 2 years follow-up (1°±4°). (See Table 2
and Table 3).
Table 2: Difference between each time interval during the course of
treatment with the SpineCor System and during follow-up.
| |
Initial
3M,ET,1Y,2Y |
3M-ET, 1Y, 2Y |
ET-1Y, 2Y |
1Y - 2Y |
| |
3M |
ET |
1 Year |
2 Year |
ET |
1 Year |
2 Year |
1 Year |
2 Year |
|
| All |
10 (5) |
7 (7) |
4 (7) |
5 (7) |
-3 (8) |
-6 (7) |
-5 (7) |
-3 (6) |
-2 (5) |
1 (4) |
| Improved |
12 (4) |
10 (6) |
8 (5) |
9 (3) |
-2 (4) |
-4 (5) |
-2 (3) |
-2 (7) |
-1 (5) |
2 (5) |
| Stable |
7 (6) |
5 (5) |
0 (3) |
1 (3) |
-2 (9) |
-6 (5) |
-5 (7) |
-4 (6) |
-4 (6) |
1 (3) |
| Aggravated |
10 (3) |
-7 (1) |
-13 (1) |
-13 (1) |
-17 (1) |
-23 (1) |
-23 (1) |
-6 (0) |
-6 (0) |
0 |
Table 3: Repeated measures analysis of variance for patients with a minimum
follow-up of 2 years.
| Conditions |
P Value |
P<0.01 |
Initial vs Three Months in Brace
Initial vs
End of Treatment
Initial vs Follow-up 1 Year
Initial vs Follow-up 2
Years |
p= 0.0000
p = 0.0003
p =
0.0002
p = 0.0006
|
*
*
*
* |
3 Months vs End of Treatment
3 Months vs
Follow-up 1 Year
3 Months vs Follow-up 2 Years |
p = 0.0135
p = 0.0181
p =
0.0081 |
* |
End of Treatment Follow-up 1 Year
End of
Treatment Follow-up 2 Years |
p = 0.999 Þ
p = 0.999
Þ |
|
| Follow-up 1 Year vs 2 Years |
p = 0.999 Þ |
|
| Þ Note: The comparison between end
of treatment and follow-up 1 year and 2 years indicates that there is no
worsening of the curve during the post-treatment follow-up period.
This is in contrast with most rigid
brace. |
3. Survival Analysis of Patients Treated with the
SpineCor System
A survival analysis as utilised by Nachemson et
al., 1995 was performed on the cohort of patients treated with the
SpineCor system. The cohort of patients was divided according to the
amplitude of the initial Cobb angle such that group 1 (G1) consisted of patients
with a Cobb angle less than 30° and group 2 (G2) consisted of patients with a
Cobb angle of greater than 30°.
A change in the Cobb angle at the end of treatment and/or
the last available visit in reference to the initial visit was utilised to
identify a correction (decrease of more than 5°), a stabilisation (change of
±5°), or aggravation (increase of more than 5°). Criteria for success was
defined as a correction or stabilization of the Cobb angle, and failure as an
aggravation of the Cobb angle.
With the initial visit as a reference point a
survival curve was constructed for the patients that are still under treatment
in addition to the withdrawal patients. The probability of obtaining a
positive treatment effect increased as the duration of treatment increased for
both groups of patients, with 95% confidence intervals of .84-1.0 and .80-.99 at
3 years of treatment in brace.
For the patients that have completed treatment the
cumulative probability of success at 4 years follow-up (combined treatment time
and post treatment follow-up time) had 95% confidence intervals that were 0.82
to 1.0 and .71 to 1.0).
A survival curve was also constructed for the patients
who have completed treatment using the end of treatment status as the reference
point vs the last available follow-up visit post-treatment as reference
points. The confidence intervals for the cumulative probability of success
at 2 years post-treatment follow-up was 0.71- 0.98 to 0.62-1.0 for groups 1 and
2 respectively.
4. Interim Results of a Prospective Randomised Study of
the Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis VS Treatment with The SpineCor
Brace
The objective of this prospective randomised study was to
compare the natural history of Idiopathic Scoliosis patients to those treated
with a SpineCor brace with a Cobb angle between 15 and 30 degrees. A
cohort of 65 patients were randomly assigned to a control non-treated (n=36;
age=12 years; Cobb angle:20±5 degrees) or treated group with the SpineCor
brace (n=29; age=12 years; Cobb angle : 22±5 degrees). Inclusion criteria
included an initial Cobb angle between 15 and 30 degrees, Risser 0, 1 or 2, high
risk of progression (increase of Cobb angle of 5 degrees or more within the last
6 months), girl or boy and no significant malformation of the spine. Each
patient underwent a comprehensive evaluation (radiological and clinical) prior
to commencing the study, at 4 month intervals during treatment and
follow-up. From both groups there were 3 patients who withdrew. For
the remaining 33 control subjects there was a mean Cobb angle of 26±8
degrees and for the treated group, 20 are still in treatment with a mean
Cobb angle in brace of 15±7 degrees. The remaining 6 patients, in the treated
group, have been weaned from the brace but for less than 1 year.
Table 4: Percentage of Patients Improved, Stable
and Worsened at the Last Available Visit
| |
Improved |
Stable |
Worsened |
Control (n=33)
Treated (n=20) |
12
76 |
36
19 |
52
5 |
This is the first prospective randomised study on Scoliosis patients
investigating the Cobb angle between 15 and 30 degrees. This interim
evaluation reveals a strong tendency where 52 percent of the control group
worsen, compared to the treated group who showed a worsening of only 5
percent. This interim result, which shows this large difference in
worsening between treated and non-treated patients, questions the logic of
continuing this prospective randomised study.
5. SpineCor Patient Treated Worldwide
The SpineCor system is currently being used at Ste-Justine Hospital as well
as 52 centres world wide with nearly 725 patients in-treatment as of April
2002. At the time of the last update of the latest available visit
for these patients are presented in Figure 5, which demonstrates an improvement
or stabilisation for 89% of the patients in treatment.

|